WHY CASTLER
For forty years, the industry protected critical software with a contract and a copy of the code. Castler replaces that act of faith with a repeatable, signed recovery procedure.
BEFORE AND AFTER
TRADITIONAL ESCROW VS CASTLER SOFTWARE RECOVERABILITY
The difference is not where the source code sits. It is whether the software has been independently rebuilt, deployed, tested, and sealed before you need it.
| Traditional Escrow | Castler Software Recoverability | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary output | Stored source code and an agreement | Signed Proof of Recovery |
| Recovery confidence | Assumed until a release event | Demonstrated before an incident |
| Verification cycle | Periodic, manual, and project-based | Repeatable and release-aware |
| Software Estate coverage | A small number of selected vendors | Designed for the full critical Software Estate |
| Evidence | Deposit records and contractual terms | Build, deployment, test, and engineer-sealed artefacts |
| Accountability | Split across vendor, escrow agent, and advisers | One Recovery Authority with a named engineer |
THE DIFFERENCE
Castler gives institutions an independent authority that can make, test, and stand behind the recoverability claim.
Institutional proof
A growing network of banks, payment institutions and financial-services leaders relies on Castler’s trust infrastructure for controlled, accountable money movement.
World’s first
Software Escrow & Recoverability Platform
Hours
Verification cycle
~90% lower
Cost per verification
100%
Critical-Software Estate coverage goal
WHY CASTLER
Bring one critical vendor release. We’ll show you the build, the deployment, and the signed evidence.
Book a 15-min briefing